The inner game - self-doubt, loneliness, and the pressure to look certain.
There’s an unspoken belief in business: once you reach senior level, you arrive.
Confidence becomes automatic.
Decisions get easier.
And self-doubt is something you’re meant to have grown out of.
In reality, the higher you go, the more visible you become, and the more weight your decisions carry. And that does something to people.
Senior leadership doesn’t remove doubt. It just makes it harder to show.
You’re expected to have answers, carry uncertainty well, and stay steady for everyone else… while you’re still a human being dealing with the same internal noise.
McKinsey show leadership roles as sitting at the intersection of dilemmas and contradictions - constant trade-offs, competing demands, and the need to manage vulnerability without losing clarity.
So the issue isn’t that leaders feel doubt. The issue is what they do next.
Because the way you handle doubt at senior level is often the difference between becoming a steady leader people trust, or a distant one people manage around.
And if you’re wondering what that looks like in real life, it’s usually small things: over-checking, holding onto work you should be delegating, delaying a hard conversation, or performing certainty when what you really need is a better question.
The first dilemma: “I’m expected to know everything… but I don’t.”
Most senior leaders won’t say this out loud, but it’s there:
That’s where the temptation kicks in - to “look invulnerable”. To be the person who always has the answer.
The problem is, invulnerable leadership creates distance. People stop telling you what you need to hear, and start telling you what they think is safe.
Harvard Business Review showed this through the lens of vulnerability: trust and openness change whether people raise issues early, or keep them back until they become bigger problems.
So if invulnerability creates distance, the next question is: what usually drives it?
The trap: perfectionism and self-protection
Perfectionism is usually framed as a strength.
In leadership, it becomes a drag on judgement.
Because it quietly turns everything into: Did I do it right? Did they approve? Will I be criticised?
And once criticism starts to feel like an attack, leaders slip into self-protection.
That’s when they become defensive, harder to read, less approachable, and ironically, less trusted.
From the outside, that can look like arrogance.
From the inside, it’s often fear wearing a suit.
And once a leader becomes harder to read and harder to reach, something else tends to follow.
“Lonely at the top” isn’t a cliché - it’s a working condition
At senior level, something odd happens socially:
Loneliness is a genuine feature of top leadership roles.
And it matters. When leaders lose perspective, decision quality suffers. They over-control, they react faster, and they stop creating space for other people to think.
Which is exactly why so many leaders struggle with the next shift, the shift in what the job actually is.
The job shift: from doing to enabling
A lot of leaders hit the same wall when they step up.
You get there by being capable. By delivering. By knowing how things “should be done”.
Then suddenly, the job becomes: make other people successful.
That requires trust, delegation, patience, and letting people learn without you stepping in every time.
That’s not a soft point. It’s a performance point.
And the reason it matters so much is because it links directly to what people are really looking for from leadership.
What people actually want from leaders
Gallup’s leadership research is clear: people want hope, trust, compassion and stability from leaders.
That’s not “be nice.” It’s: be steady, be clear, and follow through.
But here’s the issue: those needs don’t disappear when you become the leader.
You still need somewhere you can take the mask off for five minutes, and if you don’t have that, the pressure builds quietly.
So, rather than pretending this is solved by “toughness”, here are two practical moves that actually help.
Two practical moves that make this easier
1) Build a pressure-release valve (before you need it)
A confidential outlet where you can speak plainly, sense-check decisions, and vent without politics - whether that’s a coach, mentor, or trusted external sounding board.
If you don’t have that, choose one trusted external person and make it a monthly conversation. Put it in the diary like you would any other priority.
A quick test:
“Can I say the thing I’d never say internally?”
If yes, you’ve found the right space.
2) Put a weekly “quiet judgement” slot in the diary (30 minutes)
No inbox. No meetings. Just these three questions:
Put it in as a recurring meeting and protect it like a client call. If you don’t ringfence thinking time, it gets taken away.
Closing
If you’re stepping up in your career and finding that the pressure feels more personal than you expected - that’s normal. It comes with roles where decisions carry weight.
The aim isn’t to become fearless. It’s to stay clear-headed and human while the demands keep coming.
My next post (Part 2): I will discuss the outer game, how leaders can build trust and stability when they can’t share every conversation, and different stakeholders want different versions of the truth.
If any of this resonates, please let me know what part of senior leadership feels hardest to say out loud?
I work with founders and senior leaders when things become more complex than they used to be — decisions take longer, people issues carry more weight, and there’s less space to think clearly.
Post articles and opinions on Leeds Professionals
to attract new clients and referrals. Feature in newsletters.
Join for free today and upload your articles for new contacts to read and enquire further.
